Cynthia's Response to June 2010 Assignment

I was the last person to add into the reworked Cyber Chat, Cyber Spat, and I admit I was a little overwhelmed by all the information contained in the other videos.  In creating my portion, I wanted to integrate some elements from the other three choreographers, to make sense of our conversation narratively, and tie up any loose ends.  





One of my techniques was to integrate props used by the other three: books, coffee cup, and costume.  Also, after chatting with Sangita, I decided that this piece was a conference call in which we were discussing our long-distance project on courtesans: that Sandra was addressing this through theory (the books), while Shyamala was doing so performatively (through costumes).  Since I regretted not being able to read the titles of Sandra's books, I revised my earlier opening, in which I had sleepily poured myself a cup of coffee, and instead opened with myself sleeping on a pile of books (as if I'd been researching all night!).  I intentionally chose books that were salient to our project, including When God is a Customer (an erotic collection of padams), Taboo! (fieldwork on the redlight district in Lahore), Abhinayadarpanam (Sanskrit treatise on abhinaya), Telling Stories to Change the World (this was a nod to our more activist work with SAN).  


I also wanted to respect the shape of my rhythmic composition, which is a chakradar (a thrice-repeating composition), and so I broke my choreography into three sections: (1) my first "small dance" sleepiness (2) my rhythmic show-and-tell with the books and (3) my reentry to engage with a discussion about the costumes.  Within this I tried to time certain gestures and actions (coffee drinking, book moving) so that they would align with the others.

Cynthia's Research Write-up for June 2010

For my research this month, I researched the ghazal form and read a chapter of my friend Emma Kalb’s thesis regarding courtesan films.  For guidance on comments, see the unanswered questions/areas for future exploration at the end of each section, as well as whatever insights occur to you.  

(1) On the Ghazal Form:

I first encountered the ghazal not as a kathak dancer, but as a poetic form translated into English.  As I was refamiliarizing myself with the form, it gave me an idea about an internet based choreographic experiment that we could try.

According to Agha Shahid Ali, the ghazal couples formal tightness with a thematic freedom verging on arbitrariness.  Composed of thematically independent couplets, every line in a ghazal must have the same number of syllables.  The first couplet sets up a rhyme scheme and a refrain that must be followed throughout the rest of the poem, but other than the opening couplet, the refrain occurs only in the second line.  The last couplet often ends with a signature couplet in which the poet mentions his/her name.

(See “The Charms of a Considered Disunity” by Agha Shahid Ali in The Practice of Poetry.  Also see http://www.poets.org/viewmedia.php/prmMID/5781 for more details and actual examples.)

Since the four of us in Post Natyam have quite different voices, it struck me that perhaps the ghazal could be formally translated into a dance-for-camera choreographic exercise whereby we are given total expressive freedom in terms of content but are locked together by having to strictly follow certain choreographic rules.  The rules might look something like this:

(1 1. One person is selected to create the opening couplet.  This couplet is composed of two 5 second phrases, each ending in the same gesture.

(2 2. All of us then create 3 phrases, each exactly 10 seconds long. 

a.    All the movement phrases should be choreographed for the camera.

b.    Each phrase should be complete in itself (like a gem); there should be no attempt to link them to each other on any emotional or narrative level.

c.     Each phrase should end with the same gesture established by the opening “couplet.” 

d.    One phrase should somehow reference your name, however obliquely.

(3 3. After creating the phrases, we edit together the footage and see what transpired!

UNANSWERED QUESTIONS:

In his article, Ali does not talk much about the emotional content of the ghazal (implying any content is okay).  Nevertheless ghazals do tend to revolve around longing, the Beloved, love, and ponderings about the universe – staples of Urdu poetry and thematic anchors that might connect us more clearly to the subject matter of our long-distance project.  My question is how to make that connection without sacrificing the thematic freedom and arbitrariness made possible by the ghazal formally.

(2) Research Notes on  “The Nautch Girl, In Print and On Film: An Ambivalent History, An Ambivalent Nation” Emma Kalb, 2006, Senior Thesis in Asian Studies, Swarthmore College.

Chapter on “The Courtesan Film”:

On Bollywood Films and Social Hegemony:

“These are not open-ended films intended to guide the viewer toward rebellion or a cataclysmic rethinking of social norms. Bollywood offers a purging pleasure, in which events tie up nicely, wounds are healed, and dangerous, chaotic forces are tamed or exterminated.” (Nayar 1997)

“the structure of the film is... designed to accommodate deep fantasies belonging to an extraordinarily varied group of people, from illiterate workers to sophisticated urbanites.” (Mishra 2002)

“Such films works to delineate an “idealised moral universe” that “upholds the ‘official’ definition of femininity within the main plot, and then to provide ‘unofficial’ erotic pleasures… through the song and dance sequences.” (Pinney)

On the Figure of the Tawaif:

“The erotic, seductive, and independent tawaif writes the proscribed narrative of a fissiparous and still contingent nation.” (Poonam Arora)

“many celebrated tawai'ifs were in effect highly educated career women, often accomplished poets and musicians, who valued their financial and personal independence from male authority.” (Lutgendorf)

On Courtesan Films

-unique in their focus on Muslim communities, women protagonists

-reveal a nostalgia “arising from the decline and disappearance of courtesan culture.” (Dwyer and Patel)

-Films such as Umrao Jaan depict the “poetry-smitten world of 19th century Islamicate urban culture, in which all educated people were aspiring Urdu poets, and evenings were spent in mehfils or poetic gatherings.”

Womanhood and Morality: Domesticating the Courtesan?

-The films reveal a tension “between notions of ideal womanhood and historical as well as contemporary facts of how (at least some) women live.” (69)

-stories of “unrealizable desire” “transgressive love”

-direct quotations from films:

Pakeezah: “any whore is a dead body.”

Umrao Jaan: “a public woman who can never truly claim a man”

-Courtesans are usually portrayed as longing for respectability, wishing to be a wife and a proper woman:

-“the genre of the “courtesan film” strains to domesticate the whore and fit her into a wifely role (Virdi, 132)

-“The films could express something of the power and independence that come with being a tawaif, but in fact they render her the opposite, powerless and caged by what is written as natural for a woman to yearn for: respectability, the life of a wife or a daughter.” 

-courtesan as “a lotus in the muck”

-“the courtesan films delineate a morality at an impasse. The courtesan may be sympathized with, but she can never truly have a happy ending.”

- “The films strain to accomplish a balancing act, giving rein to transgressive love and other normally unacceptable behaviors even as they recuperate the transgressors in one way or another back into the nation, finding a resolution that does not challenge the moral bases of society.”

-“It may refuse to portray the courtesan as anything but as close to a pure Hindu wife as a Muslim prostitute living in a bordello can be, but there is a necessary ambivalence to that image.”

Works Cited:

Dwyer, Rachel and Divia Patel. Cinema India: The Visual Culture of Hindi Film. New Brunswick, New Jersey: Rutgers University Press, 2002.

Lutgendorf, Philip. philip’s fil-ums: notes on Indian popular cinema.             [http://www.uiowa.edu/%7Eincinema/index.html].

Mishra, Vijay. Bollywood Cinema: Temple of Desire. New York: Routledge, 2002.

Nayar, Sheila. “The values of fantasy: Indian popular cinema through Western scripts.” Journal of Popular Culture, Summer 1997, p. 73-91.

Pinney, Christopher. “Public, Popular, and Other Cultures” in Rachel Dwyer and Christopher Pinney, eds. Pleasure and the Nation: The History, Politics, and Consumption of Public Culture in India. New Delhi: Oxford University Press, 2001

Virdi, Jyotika. The Cinematic ImagiNation: Indian Popular Films as Social History. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 2003.

INSIGHTS AND QUESTIONS FOR FUTURE EXPLORATION:

The contradictory tension between an ideal notion of womanhood and the lived reality of women (both historical and contemporary) seems like a possible thematic throughline in our work.  If so, I would then ask: How have these idealized notions of womanhood (particularly a Hindu nationalist patriarchal version) impacted each of us personally?  How has our dance been implicated in that? How, if at all, do you feel like breaking that mold?  Is Bollywood and its representations of women dancers implicated in this and how?

Shyamala's Response to June 2010 Assignment

Ok, here's my Cyber Chat, take 2


Cyber Chat 2 from Shyamala Moorty on Vimeo.


Here I got only 1 part of the music so had to respond to just the one thing and my other vocals.

Some things I did differently then the last Cyber Chat:

I purposefully took actions from each of the others' pieces and hope it will tie us more together in case they use them again.

I also tried to address our larger themes of the figure of the courtesan through bringing in the costumes...not sure if it's obvious, but if you see the costumes in the live performance it might be a nice tie in. They are what I'm thinking of using for the new solo I am working on with Cynthia and Anj's videos projected on me in white (see my solo dance in progress during Post Natyam Unveiled).

Not sure if we're giving feedback this month since this may be the final version, so I'll hold off on questions.

June Creative Assignment: Reworking “Cyber Chat, Cyber Spat”

For our June Assignment, Sangita and I have hatched a plan to rework our “Cyber Chat, Cyber Spat” piece.  The structure is an experiment in how to use the internet to effectively co-choreograph a single work, using a strategy of having each choreographer build on what the previous one has created.

We’ve separated out the musical score into four layers as follows.  When choreographing your section, you will see everything that the previous members have choreographed on the video that Sangita syncs for you, but will only hear your musical track.

rhythm 1: Shyamala

ghazal/typing: Sandra

chatting/baby cry: Anjali

rhythm 2: Cynthia

Here is the timeline for the choreographic process:

May 26 Cynthia and Sangita give assignment

June 1 Shyamala finishes and sends to Sangita

June 2-3 Sangita syncs and sends to Sandra

June 4-10 Sandra finishes and sends to Sangita

June 11-12 Sangita syncs and sends to Anjali

June 13-18 Anjali finishes and sends to Sangita

June 19-20 Sangita syncs and sends to Cynthia

June 21-27 Cyn finishes and sends to Sangita

June 28-30: Sangita edit and sends out final piece to all

Also, please follow the following rules when choreographing your section:

1    1. single shot/no cuts or editing

      2. webcam style (no one moves the camera for you)

3.   3. In choreographing your part, please (1) stay attuned to your musical layer and also (2) be in relation to the others’ choreography.

If you wish, you may also keep Shyamala’s original "Cyber Padam" assignment in mind.  Be sure to send your video file to Sangita in the following format: mov file, 4:3 format.  You may send your file to Sangita via yousendit.com.  Please cc me on any correspondence so that I know we're keeping to the timeline!

Researching the Figure of the Courtesan

In keeping with Post Natyam’s mission to support our creative investigations with critical inquiry, we have decided to try researching the figure of the courtesan in the Indian subcontinent in a more formalized way. This research will run parallel to our creative assignments, and its intention is to give weight to and deepen our individual investment in the subject matter.

Each of us will engage in research through the lens of our own personal interest. Currently our individual interests are as follows:

Sandra – courtesans and Bollywood

Anjali – devadasis and the blurring of sacred and secular

Cynthia – Muslim influences and the Urdu ghazal tradition

Shyamala – alternative models of womanhood and connections to SAN

Each month, we will post monthly reports on our individual research to this blog. To encourage cross-dialogue, we plan to read each other's reports and make comments within a week.

Reports may include:

(1) research notes

(2) juicy insights, facts, revelations gleaned through your research

(3) ways in which you might imagine the research affecting our creative process or clarifying the artistic vision of our project

(4) a complete list of references that you consulted (with links when possible)

(5) unanswered questions and thoughts about what you want to investigate further

For this first go-around, we plan to post our reports by June 14 and give comments by June 20.