Vamp. The fallen white woman. Helen. (The other…)
Upon reading the excerpts that Sandra assigned, I was not sure how to go
about the assignment. Seeing how closely cabaret and politics were related in
Germany, I began to wonder whether cabaret in Hindi cinema had any kind of
politics at all? Was it just a kitschy glitz and glamour loaded song and dance
sequence meant only for entertainment? Or was it there to justify the
objectification and putting on display of women’s bodies? Or was it part of the
accepted ‘formulas’ that supposedly ensure the box office returns for a film? I
also wondered what kind of a formula justified the presence and position of a
cabaret number in the story or narrative of a film? How did they (the
filmmakers and producers) convince their viewers that such a song and dance
number was required to take the story further? Or was it a way for the masses,
the working class, to get a peep into what the Hindi cinema industry propagated
as ‘high society’ nightlife? Did it bring the masses a step closer to
understanding the recreation styles of the elite? Did cabaret in Hindi cinema
ever get an opportunity to try and communicate any political stands, opinions
or messages to its audiences?
Pondering over these questions, I revisited the cabaret numbers in Hindi
cinema, especially the ones with Helen in them. Watching the so called
‘characterless’, alcohol drinking, cigarette smoking, night-club visiting,
western garment wearing- cleavage showing fashion-ista, the fallen white-woman,
I began to realise that probably the Hindi film industry did have a very clear
political agenda and thus chose the cabaret for a very specific reason. The use
of politics in Hindi cinema cabaret was very different from the way the German's
used the cabarett platform. So unlike the German cabaret, which was resistive
and anarchic, etc. the Hindi cinema cabaret seemed to have a strong
nationalistic agenda embedded in it. Though very interestingly camouflaged by
the Hindi Cinema grammar of glitz and glamour, these songs, which
were present to increase the commercial value of a film, did serve a political
purpose.
Helen was clearly the other woman. The outsider who was vicious,
scheming and almost the devil incarnate. She was the seductress who stole
husbands, broke homes and caused nothing but disaster and brought misery to
happy families. She was the villain’s sex object and at times his partner in
crime. She, using her beauty, her blue eyes and peaches and cream complexion
almost always successfully seduced rich men, whose money of course the villain
took and then surely shot her. She was a chameleon who could take on the sati-savitri
act at a drop of a hat and then mockingly undraped her saree to reveal her
mini-skirt and to laugh at the innocence, simplicity and stupidity of the
leading ladies who were the unmatchable images of sacrifice, kindness, love and
wisdom - the adarsh bharatiya nari.
So for me, the political agenda behind the use of cabaret becomes
clearly that of image building for the newly formed nation - India. The task
then was to probably define Indian-ness and what meaning and values- cultural
as well as moral, one must associate with it. By using cabaret thus the image
of the ‘model- Indian- women’ is also being built. Except that the modus
operandi here being that of juxtaposition of the characters of the “good”
leading ladies with that of characters of the vamps- the cabaret dancers, which
were mostly played by actresses like Helen. So clearly, the outsider, the foreigner,
the white woman, who in this case becomes the personification of everything
erotic, bad, evil and untrue becomes the example of someone who is not virtuous
enough to be Indian. In fact she could also be described as the person who
introduced women from good homes to the darker side and thus needed to be
avoided. She was someone no girl/woman from a ‘good family’ should aspire to
become. For when weighing on a scale of virtue and morality, and judging fights
of good against evil, she who is the epitome of all evil, always lost.
In the introduction of the book Recasting Women: Essays in Indian
Colonial History, edited by Kumkum Sangari and Sudesh Vaid, describe
‘womanhood’ as often being a ‘part of an asserted or desired, not actual
cultural continuity.’ So if the desire in post independent India was to
construct a new set of cultural paradigms that put India on the world map with
an absolutely unique identity, then one of the most important definitions would
be that of Indian womanhood. So Helen’s characters interestingly made it easier
for women to choose what they were not to be, thus creating an ambiguous
definition of Indian via defining the non-Indian.
With hardly any television or electronic media in the early 1950’s in
fact right up to the 1970’s, Cinema, could be considered as the strongest
medium to communicate with the masses. So it also probably became the strongest
possible medium to propagate the desired national image. So maybe, cabaret in
Hindi cinema did have a very strong political position but in a very different
way than the German cabaret, which was all about resistance, anarchism,
etc...so the opposite!
I find your argument that the foreign vamp, as represented by Helen, served as an "other" against which nationalist ideals of Indian women were defined to be a provocative and convincing one. Given how Orientalism mediates the reception of Indian dance in the West, it is particularly interesting to me to hear how representations of the other function in India - how the script is flipped, as it were. How might the collision of these stereotypes and fantasies of the other between India, Europe, and the US argue with, inform, or undermine each other? What would Helen and Ruth St. Denis (or Maud Allan) have to say to each other?
ReplyDeleteAnother question I have is whether the foreign vamp still exists as a trope in current Bollywood films, or whether many of her traits of westernized sexuality may have been absorbed into current Indian heroines? What does that say about the shifting agendas of the Indian nation-state?
My thoughts, similar to Cynthia's, went to a comparison of what we normally think of as the "other" in Western countries and how it is the flip or opposite of what the "other" is in India - at least in terms of location. On the other hand, both ideas of the other women are hyper sexualized and while they are warnings against being the "other" to the women of each nation, they are also outlets for temporary embodiment or enjoyment of the other under the pretense of portraying (acting/dancing) and viewing the other. Helen was certainly the fallen woman, but how much pleasure people got out of seeing (and sometimes copying) her portray her vices! Her performance acts as a way for people to enjoy the vice without being identified as the evil doer themselves. The nude dancers of Salome in the European cabarets similarly used the idea of Salome to dance nude, and in portraying her they and their audiences got a taste of the freedom of breaking the norms of their own society with the imagined portrayal of someone from another society.
ReplyDeleteSangita recently made me aware of an upcoming Nouveau Devadasi Festival that comes to mind as a contemporary example of this: http://www.nouveaudevadasi.com/
Interesting to note that the name of the venue hosting the festival in San Francisco is German-like: Danzhause (wouldn't it be Tanzhause Babli?) And here is the promo video for the event: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tui5kXROGVw
Of course what's missing in this comparison between the two "others" is the power dynamic, who has the power to portray whome and what are the affects of that portrayal on the other group?